Archive for the ‘Prison Marriages’ Category

Rev. Edward Blackwelder: Ministering to Serial Killers

Saturday, May 7th, 2011
by Brett Buckner
 | From his home in Piedmont, Eddie Blackwelder runs the nonprofit Criminology Research Project, an academic Web site dedicated to the study of serial, spree and mass murder. He has built a career based on encounters with such murderers as Ted Bundy. Photo: Submitted photo
From his home in Piedmont, Edward Blackwelder runs the nonprofit Criminology Research Project, an academic Web site dedicated to the study of serial, spree and mass murder. He has built a career based on encounters with such murderers as Ted Bundy.
 In the summer of 1984, Edward Blackwelder came face to face with a monster.

He was a criminal justice professor at Wallace State Community College in Hanceville, teaching a course on mass murderers and serial killers.  But the textbooks were inadequate.  Blackwelder wanted to give his students a more visceral experience.  So he and a female intern named Janice drove 400 miles to death row at Florida State Prison in Starke.

“When visiting a jail,” Blackwelder said, “you never know for sure that you’re going to get in until that metal door slams behind you.”

They were ushered through a series of gates and metal doors before being greeted by a correctional officer.

“Mr. Bundy has been waiting for you,” the officer said.

Down the hallway and around a corner was a small cage in the middle of a large room. Inside the cage sat Theodore Robert Bundy.

“Just call me Ted,” Bundy said, smiling. “You must be Professor Blackwelder.”

Instinctively, Blackwelder reached through the bars and shook hands with one of the most notorious serial killers in history, hands that had strangled and bludgeoned to death upwards of 30 women, including 12-year-old Kimberly Leach, whom Bundy was convicted of kidnapping, raping and murdering before dumping her body in an abandoned hog pen.

With his hands and feet shackled, Bundy was led into a small room . Though a guard stood outside, the only thing separating student and teacher from this cold-blooded killer was a wooden table. From the moment they were alone, Blackwelder wasted no time in getting to the point.

“I’m here to use you,” he said, “because you’re an exquisite specimen.”

Today, from their home in Piedmont, Blackwelder and his wife, Shirley, run the nonprofit Criminology Research Project, an academic Web site dedicated to the study of serial, spree and mass murder.  Blackwelder, 63, retired from teaching in 1992, after being diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease.  Through encounters with notorious killers like Bundy, Charles Manson and Jeffery Dahmer, Blackwelder built a career not only of science, but of faith.

On that summer day in 1984, Blackwelder was impressed by Bundy’s cool demeanor.

“Bundy was an average guy,” he remembers. “If I had a daughter, he’d be the kind of guy I’d want her to date, because he seems so normal. But that’s just a mask. Underneath, he’s a diabolical killing machine.”

For more than three hours, they interviewed Bundy, discussing everything from football and abortion to the death penalty.

“Society needs to be protected from people like me,” Bundy said. “And there are others out there just like me.”

That was the first of four interviews that Blackwelder had with Bundy before he was executed in Florida’s electric chair on Jan. 24, 1989.  Bundy told Blackwelder that, from his cell in the hours before an execution, he could smell the diesel fuel and hear the generator warming up.  Through a nearby window, he could see the hearse waiting outside.

Yet when Blackwelder asked if Bundy was “right with the Lord,” Bundy’s answer was as enigmatic as the killer himself — a once bright and charming law student who savagely preyed on young women.

“I’m not worried about what happened yesterday, and I’m not concerned about what may happen tomorrow,” he said. “I’m cosmic and you’d be better off if you were cosmic too.”

Looking back, Blackwelder still isn’t sure what Bundy meant.

“But I’ve got to believe when that jolt of electricity hit him, he found out what being cosmic is all about.”

‘Among the evil’

He’s befriended the Atlanta Child Murderer and accepted collect calls from The Hillside Strangler. In 1970, he used Christmas money to fly to California to watch the trial of Charles Manson.

He has FBI files and letters from Manson, Ted Bundy and The Unabomber. He’s interviewed Jeffrey Dahmer, calling the serial killer/cannibal “a doll … just as sweet as can be.”

Blackwelder performed the wedding of Heath Stocks, who murdered his entire family with a .45 handgun, and stood less than six feet away when child-killer Ernest Dobbert was executed in Florida’s electric chair.

During every interview, Blackwelder, who’s been an ordained minister since 1990, talks of salvation, serving as a witness — a flawed man of faith — to those whom society would rather throw away.

“That’s where the preacher is supposed to be — among the evil, the wretched, the unforgiven,” he says. “You can’t do any good in church. There comes a time when you’ve gotta say ‘Amen,’ then get up, get out and go do something useful. …

“If we got what we deserved, we’d all go straight to hell,” he says. “It’s only through the saving grace of Jesus Christ that we’re given the choice.”

Growing up in Piedmont, Blackwelder, like most kids in the rural South, regularly attended church. He did and said all the right things — joining Piedmont First Baptist Church when he was 12 — but the cavalier attitude and transgressions of a hard-headed young man ultimately won out.

“Sin was fun,” he says, grinning at memories better left untold. “I tried to be good. I wanted to be good, but I was just too busy living Eddie’s way.”

Then his mother was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s. In the years to follow, she wouldn’t recognize her husband, waking up frightened by the stranger sharing her bed. Blackwelder, who was working full time, would have to lock his mother in the house so she wouldn’t wander the streets.

“That was probably the first time I ever really thought about God,” he says. “I started praying because I needed help. But even though I’d moved closer to God, I was still living the way I wanted to live.”

Blackwelder’s journey wouldn’t be complete until New Year’s Eve 1985. He was celebrating at the Officer’s Club at Fort McClellan, when around 9:30 he received an emergency phone call. His father had suffered a stroke. The night was so thick with fog, Blackwelder could barely see over the hood of his car driving to the hospital. Not knowing if his father would live or die, he made a promise.

“I said, ‘God, let him live. But if he’s gonna die, let me be there when he does. And if you do that, I’ll live the rest of my life for you.’ “

Blackwelder’s father survived the stroke, but was severely weakened. His mother died in 1989, followed by his father in 1990.

“God will get your attention one way or another,” Blackwelder says. “And he never forgets.”

 

                                                                                         Hooked on Crime
The first time Blackwelder visited a prison was with his father in 1959, when they toured the old Holman Prison near Wetumpka. He even got a chance to see and touch the electric chair, nicknamed “Yellow Mama” — though he declined to take a seat.

But it was a term paper that spawned Blackwelder’s macabre curiosity. In 1964, while a senior at Piedmont High School, Blackwelder wrote a research paper for political science class on “Crime in America.”

“From that moment I was hooked,” Blackwelder says, grinning. “I read every true crime magazine I could get my hands on, looking for the stuff boys like best — blood and guts.”

After graduating from Jacksonville State University in 1975, Blackwelder pursued criminal justice and sociology, gathering graduate and post-graduate degrees from the University of Alabama, JSU, UAB and Nova-Southeastern University.  By the early ’80s, he was teaching criminal justice at Gadsden State and political science at St. Bernard College, before developing the curriculum for the criminal justice program at Wallace State Community College.

His research is meant to gain insight into the minds of serial and mass murderers. It’s a philosophy that Blackwelder maintained with his students, whom he often took to trials and jails to gain firsthand knowledge.  But more than the legal side, he also showed his students the devastation that criminals wrought on families, by having victims share their stories.

“I always wanted to give students both sides,” he says. “These were not just stories in a book, names and dates to memorize. These were people’s lives, and some of those lives had been destroyed.  I wanted my students to see that.”

Through his access to various jails, Blackwelder began to focus his faith on prisoners.  But it wasn’t until 1984, sitting at home watching Jerry Falwell’s Old Time Gospel Hour, that he found his calling. During the program, Falwell mentioned Liberty Prison Outreach, one of the largest such ministries in the country.

“I didn’t know how to run a prison ministry,” Blackwelder says. “All I knew was that when these guys died, I wanted them to go to heaven.”

Blackwelder called Falwell’s church in Lynchburg, Va., where he spoke with Garry Sims, director of the prison ministry. As soon as Blackwelder learned that Sims was from Weaver, their friendship was immediate — as long as conversations didn’t linger too long on high school football. Blackwelder was invited to Virginia, where he met with Falwell for advice.

“Eddie’s a dedicated — some might say eccentric — and passionate man,” Sims says. “Eddie’s not your typical preacher — not by a long shot. If you go to the Huddle House in Piedmont at 3 a.m., that’s where you’ll find Eddie — that’s when the drunks, the whores and the drug addicts come in. Now you couldn’t put Eddie up in the pulpit at the First Baptist Church, because the people he’s lookin’ to save wouldn’t be there anyway.”

Faith was always a part of Blackwelder’s prison interviews. While the more notorious killers — Bundy and Charles Manson for example — offered little in return, all were respectful about the subject … save for one: John Wayne Gacy, Chicago’s “Killer Clown,” who murdered 33 boys and buried them under his house.

“He wouldn’t even let me get started,” Blackwelder says of their phone interview. “He just said, ‘Look, you son-of-a-bitch, I know what you’re all about, and I don’t wanna hear it.’ That was pretty much the end of it.”

But there have been success stories.

In 1972, Ernest Dobbert was tried and convicted for beating his 9-year-old daughter to death. Later evidence linked him to the death of his 7-year-old son as well as two other children.  In the months leading up to Dobbert’s execution in Florida, Blackwelder met with him, for both academic and spiritual purposes.

On Sept. 7, 1985, when Dobbert was electrocuted, it was Blackwelder who led him those final few steps, praying with him along the way.  And when the switch was thrown, Blackwelder was standing some six feet away.

“I know that when he died, Ernie went to be with the Lord,” he says. “What he did was awful … killing his own children … but he left that prison a changed man, a better man.”

Collect Call from the Hillside Strangler

 While teaching Edward Blackwelder began received a steady stream of letters and phone calls from death row inmates and their family members from across the nation.  More and more serial killers began to learn of Blackwelder’s work and began contacting him.

 And then, late one night, the phone rang. On the other end was the Hillside Strangler, making a collect call from prison.

“What could this guy want?” Blackwelder thought.

Blackwelder knew Bianchi wanted something. His correspondence with Bianchi had proven as much. Whether it was typewriter ribbon or opinions on his unpublished novel, Bianchi always had ulterior motives.

“He wanted us to help him find his son,” Blackwelder remembers. “It was a long shot, but I said I would try.”

Blackwelder and his wife, Shirley, who is a paralegal and his best research assistant, started digging. Within a few days, a photograph arrived from Bianchi, a worn-out picture of the boy who was an infant when Bianchi was convicted. All he knew what that the boy was living with his maternal grandfather somewhere in California.

After getting the man’s last name, Shirley called every name in the phone book until she found the right one. The boy, who was in his teens, wouldn’t come to the phone. Instead, Shirley spoke to the grandfather.

“He’ll never see that boy again,” he said. “Don’t ever call again.”

Though they failed at the reunion, Blackwelder took the photo Bianchi sent and had it blown up to an 8-by-10, giving him at least something to hold on to.

“And that’s something at least,” Blackwelder says. “Probably more than he deserved.”

“He’ll never see that boy again,” he said. “Don’t ever call again.”

Kenneth Bianchi and his cousin Angelo Buono Jr. were dubbed The Hillside Stranglers for their signature method of dumping the bodies of their victims in the hillside surrounding Los Angeles during a four-month period between 1977 and 1978. Buono died in jail of a heart attack, while Bianchi continues to serve a life sentence at Washington State Penitentiary.

Marriage of the Eagle Scout

One by one, as they walked into the house after a basketball game on Jan. 17, 1997, Heath Stocks shot and killed his mother, father and younger sister. Once an Eagle Scout growing up in Lonoke, Ark., Stocks, who was 20 years old at the time of the murder, had been molested for years by his scout master.

Though he doesn’t condone Stocks’ killing spree, Blackwelder has remained close to the young man, offering advice both legal and spiritual.

“I would consider Heath Stocks an exception in that he should eventually be considered for parole.  As a general rule, however, I have never be for letting APD offenders out of jail,” he says.  Heath Stock, however, is more of a victim than an offender and there is ample evidence to prove that he is.

Blackwelder even agreed to perform Stocks’ wedding to a woman who had seen his case on Court TV, left her husband and moved to Lonoke to be closer to him. Knowing the marriage was doomed, Blackwelder opposed it, but after prayer and counseling the couple, he honored the request.

The wedding was at the prison chapel. The bride wore a white gown with a train, and Blackwelder’s wife served as the maid of honor.  After the service, Stocks and his new bride sat in a pew holding hands for 15 minutes before the guards took Stocks back to his cell.

Angry and bitter for having her wedding night ruined by the reality of marrying a convicted killer, the new bride was consoled by Blackwelder and Shirley over dinner at Garfield’s.

“You’ll never be any closer to Heith than you were tonight,” Blackwelder told her. “That’s the kind of marriage you’ve gotten into.”

The couple divorced within a few months. Stocks has since remarried to a loving, caring, dedicated and professional lady who understands the turmoil that Heath tolerated during his early years.

“These guys are incapable of love,” Blackwelder says. “I don’t feel sorry for them, but it’s sad that they have no conscience and no concept of what love is.”  Dr. Blackwelder points out that Heath Stocks, only as an adult, is learning the meaning of true love and considers Stocks a rare exception.

 

Befriending the Atlanta Child Murderer

In 1982 Edward Blackwelder got a phone call from the legal team representing Atlanta Child Murderer Wayne Williams as he stood trial for murder.

During the trial, Blackwelder served as a consultant, splitting his time between sitting at the table with Williams and sitting beside his mother and father, Homer and Faye Williams, in the gallery.

At the time, Homer was already an old man, and Faye had cancer. She wanted someone to help look out for her son.

“We’re all Wayne’s got,” Faye Williams told Blackwelder one afternoon after her son had been sentenced to life in prison. “I want you to promise that you’ll never forsake my son.”

Through countless appeals, DNA testing and requests for a new trial, Blackwelder kept that promise, visiting Williams in prison and writing letters often.

“It hasn’t been easy,” Blackwelder says. “Wayne’s not always the easiest person to get along with.”

Blackwelder’s relationship with Williams lured him to Columbus, Ga. on a muggy, overcast afternoon in August, where in the backyard of a house on Meadow Drive sat a 1970 Chevy station wagon, left to rot among the weeds and fallen tree branches.

The car became infamous in 1981 when around 2 a.m. on May 22, Williams was stopped by police while driving the station wagon, which belonged to his father, after an officer staking out the James Jackson Parkway Bridge heard a splash below in the dark waters of the Chattahoochee River. Though police let Williams go that night, he became a suspect in the Atlanta Child Murders two days later, when the body of 27-year-old Nathaniel Carter was found floating in the same river.

When Williams was convicted of two murders and implicated in 22 others, it was based largely on dog hair and carpet fibers, many of which were related to the Chevy station wagon. After the trial, Homer Williams reclaimed possession of the car, often taking it fishing.

After Homer died in 2005, the car was parked by an old shed, its windows rolled down until the doors had nearly rusted shut.

Blackwelder was given custody of the car by Wayne Williams, and went to Columbus to have it towed back to Piedmont. A camera crew from CNN was there filming a documentary about the Williams case.

“I’m still collecting pieces,” said CNN executive producer Jim Polk, who has interviewed and is working closely with Blackwelder on the documentary. “I don’t even know what the puzzle looks like.”

Blackwelder was simply doing his due diligence for a piece of evidence that could become relevant again. “Not saying that it will, but if this ever got back to trial, it’s better to have it and not need it, than it is to need it and not have it.

After he retired, Edward Blackwelder sought a greater purpose for the research materials and FBI case files he’s collected throughout his long career studying mass murderers and serial killers.  Blackwelder makes his research materials available through Criminology Research Project, Inc;  all of his files are available online or for the asking to college professors, attorneys, students, law enforcement agencies and those curious to learn more about serial killers. Visit the Criminology Research Project at http://criminologyresearch.org.

Dr. and Mrs. Blackwelder live in Piedmont, Alabama and are members of Bush Arbor Baptist Church in Rome, Georgia.  The professor is a frequent lecturer and author.  His book, Deadly Little Secret, the detailed story of the Heath Stocks multiple murders of his father, mother and teenaged sister in Lonoke County, Arkansas, is expected to be available soon.

Free World Women That Marry Men Behind Bars

Thursday, September 24th, 2009

I am constantly ask, why does a woman marry a man locked up in prison, some serving a life-without-parole sentence?  At first this may be a good question and the answer could be, “It’s crazy.”  However, first, it happens regularly.  Second, let’s take a look at a thing or two.

Most people believe that if a woman marries a prisoner there must be something wrong with her, a mental or emotional disorder of some kind.  The tendency is to think right away that it’s the “bad boy” syndrome where the woman is attracted to this personality or way of life.  Then there is the belief, even though incorrect, that these women lack self-esteem or have issues of insecurity that cause them to gravitate to men in situations that confine their movement, thus, their ability to be unfaithful.  Some even believe, again a mistaken idea, than no one else must want these women and in desperation she clings to the first man who shows them an ounce of love and affection. 

The reasons why women marry men behind bars have birthed many theories, speculation abounds, and has been talked about for as long as I can remember.  Articles have been written, as have books, all generally featuring women from abused and dysfunctional backgrounds who weren’t able to rise above circumstances, such as a  troubled childhood and family, coupled with a traumatic youth.  The false idea is that these various possibilities opened them up to a relationship as troubled as the experiences they had previously endured.  The stereotype associated with women who marry man behind bars is that they’re trailer trash, uneducated, dependent upon the welfare system, typically minority, old, fat, ugly, etc.  There’s a long list of “this is why she married a convict” reasons.

These assumptions, speculations, and theories, while applicable in some cases, are far from the truth.  Prison wives today are progressive, educated, professional, resilient, self-sufficient, secure, confident, well-spoken and classy.  They marry men behind bars for love and because they believe in the men they have chosen to spend their lives with.  These women have ample options.  Many have been in so-called “normal” marriages prior to their marriage to an inmate.  Stereotypes no longer apply to this unique group of women.  This is a new breed of prison wives, women with diverse interests, special talents, and a variety of skills and experiences who chose to take the path that leads to a different kind of love journey not because of desperation or low self-esteem, and certainly not because no other man would have them.  They chose this path because they love and because they believe in themselves and the men they love enough to give them and this kind of relationship a chance.  They have examined the “good” and the “bad” associated with being married to an inmate from every angle: their man is in prison because he committed a crime, etc.  They concluded that despite the act(s) that resulted in their loved one having been incarcerated, the good in them far ourweighs the bad that they did and deserve a second chance.

At present, Criminology Research Project, Inc., is dealing with a marriage such as this that involves a very intelligent, successful, strong willed, family supported and highly educated free world woman.  She merely fell in love with an inmate, came to know him over a period of several years, and reached the conclusion that “he” was the man of her dreams.  It will, no doubt, dissappoint many that “know” this marriage will ultimately fail.  I, personally, don’t think that it will.

I had over a two hour discussion with Kathie just today and found out things I didn’t know.  Everything I learned about her was positive.  She understood the drawbacks of marriage to “her man” long before she took her vows and is accepting these various drawbacks very well.  She told me, “I fall more in love with my husband with every passing day.”  I have no doubt that what she is saying is the truth.

Why do I believe that what she is saying is true?  Let me count them:  she backs her feelings with action, she uses her husbands last name, she mkes him part of her live in so many ways.  She makes sure he knows how much the weekly grocery bill is, consults him on getting her car repaired, seeks his advice on spending money and values his advice and opinions.  She is making sure that he, Heath, stays abreast of family life and does not become institutionalized.  In short, Kathie is making sure that Heath is, indeed, a member of the family…his and her family.

Is Kathie’s marriage to her inmate husband creating problems for her?  You had better believe it is.  Only yesterday her former husband had her served with a legal document indicating that he is taking her to court to gain sole custody of their two minor children on the single ground that, “you have to be mentally unstable to marry a mass murderer.”  There is no other evidence, not a single shred.  There are, nevertheless, many examples of Kathie’s being a competent Mom, of being mentally stable and more than marginally capable of properly raising her two young children.

The former husband, in my opinion, posses very few traits that make him a father worthy of sole custody of his children.  I will withhold specifics at the moment as litigation is pending.  I will, however, be more specific once the litigation is past and a final decision by the Court has been handed down.  In fact, I will published the Courts “official document” on this site so that you may read, evaluate and draw your own conclusion.  I don’t expect anyone to take my word as the sole determing factor, indeed I hope that you don’t.  Expect and demand facts, evidence and proof.  Believe me I will make every effort to present each of these three elements and make them known to you, our reader.

The fact is, it is most difficult to remove a minor child from the custody of it’s maternal parent.  Past and present case law proves this.  If you hve any doubts I invite you to go to your local law library and do research.  In fact, the Court has a tendency to bend over backward to leave custody with the mother even when, at times, I question if to do so is actually in the best interest of the child.  One example that comes to mind is a case where the mother was a prostitute and the father filed for sole custody.  A full background investigation revealed that the mother was doing everything right in raising her child, she just prostituted.  The Court ruled that there was no evidence that she had ever engaged in sex in the presence of her child and, therefore, this one questionable act of, shall we say “immorality” did not constitue her being an unfit mother.  The investigation revealed that she was a loving parent, provided adequately for her child in every respect both physically and emotionally and went out of her way to provide everything the child needed plus much of what the child just wanted.  Today, this child of several years ago is grown, well-rounded and is living a successful life.  The prostitution evidence was nothing more than a “bump in the road” if even so much as that.

It is important to remember that the sole concern of the Court is the best interests of the child, nothing more.  In the current case that Criminology Research Project, Inc., is involved, there is not a shred of evidence that Kathie is unstable, unfit or lacking in any of the traits that make one a competent, loving, caring and capable mother.  Will she retain sole custody on her court date?  The likelyhood is statistically probable…an outstanding “Yes.”

Kathie has had the usual ups and downs but has handled each in a mature and proper manner.  Under stress she has performed well.  In my opinioin she will weather the storm like a trooper, will continue to be maintain sole custody of her two children, will raise them properly and will, one day, see them grow into adulthood as successful, well-rounded members of society.  I have very little doubt that this will become reality but we will “wait a time with patience” and watch.  I have no crystal ball only years of research to back my opinion.

Kathie understands that a court proceeding is adversarial, I have told her this.  When she appears at her hearing, a prelude to an actual court appearance, she knows that she will be dragged over the coals, made to look horrible and, most definitely be accused of haing a lack of stability.  The opposing attorney’s job is to represent the best interest of his/her client.  In this case the attorney’s client is Kathie’s former husband.  Kathie is prepared and her attorney will prepare her even more.  Come the day in October when she comes face-to-face with her former husband she will present herself great.  She will come across professionally, competently and will demonstrate the potential that she has.  She will win!

I could not adequately end this blog without admitting that a large percentage of inmate marriages fail.  This is a proven fact.  Nevertheless, there are many exceptions…Kathie’s marriage to her present inmate husband is one of these.  Kathie, as well as her inmate husband, fully understand that their marriage is not typical.  They understand the pitfalls of such a relationship and are more than prepared to take each as it comes.

As a minister I have performed prison marriages only after extensive marital counseling in which I covered the “ups” and “downs” that will come and should, therefore, be expected.  Kathie had her new husband are prepared, willing, and ready for any and every eventuality.  Yes, they understand the road will be rough at times, an unforgiving society will make sure of this.  Both understand that there will be times of disagreement, equally they understand that each disagreement can be successfully worked out as long as both have a true desire to take the steps to do so.  I believe, after my investigation and after coming to know both Kathie and Heath, that both have this “true desire.”

Times change, folkways and mores come and go.  Today, prison marriages are more common than ever and are increasing at an astounding rate.  Too, the percentages of success are increasing.  This is 2009, it’s time for society to accept change, afterall change is coming whether some like it or not.  There was a time when women could not vote, a time when interacial dating and marriage was illegal, a time when the sale of alcohol was prohibited, a time when blacks were not allowed to attend white schools.  These changes in folkways and mores have become reality, so will the acceptance of prison marriages.  There will never be total acceptance of any of these changes in folkways, mores and laws. Ignorance, low socioeconomics and a lack of education will make sure of this.  For the enlightened these changes will be accepted and will become a part of our culture as “status quo” is not stagnant.  Status quo changes slowly but it does change.  The conservative element of our society sees to this as is apparent when one reads the daily newspaper or tunes in to the nightly news.    Thte nature of our access to media even suffered during change.  I remember when Ted Turner was laughed at and called “stupid” for his idea of founding an around-the-clock cable news network.  He, for whatever reason, chose the name Cable News Network or CNN for short.  Due to “status quo” it took time for CNN to be accepted by mainstream society and in it’s infancy operated at a deficit.  Today CNN is the world leader in total news media and is well respected and watched to the dismay of NBC, CBS, ABC and practically all newspapers.  Those that laughed at Ted Turner’s “far out” idea of creating his own total news cable network are silent. 

Believe me, Kathie’s attorney is not going to sit through her hearing like a potted plant.  Kathie’s best interests will be protected just as her former husband’s will be.  This is how it should be as it is the nature of our judicial system.

You will be hearing more about Kathie.  She will have her own statement to make following the handing down of the Court’s final decision.  You will read it first on Criminology Research Project’s web-site.  Her present husband, Heath, will have his own statement as well.  You, the reader, will have your opportunity to send your personal message to both Kathie and Heath.

For now, while awaiting the October date for Kathie’s hearing, CRP will continue it’s research and will provide professionally research facts for her attorney to present should he/she choose to do so.  Providing professional research is the goal of Criminology Research Project, Inc., and we will not fail in this case.  CPR has never taken a skewed approach to it’s research, never will.  The theory of “letting the chips fall where they may,” is our philosophy.  Any other product of research cannot be deemed to be labeled “professional.”

I encourage you, the reader, to make a comment.  Every comment is important to CRP with a final summary of these comments appearing at a later date.  Please, think about the subject of this blog, determine the difference between “opinion” and “fact.”  Only by doing this will you gain insight as to reality and, thus, become a better informed citizen.

Thanks from Kathie, Heath, and the people at CRP for taking time to read this rather lengthly thesis.  Thanks for choosing our site as your source of documentable and accurate research findings.  One of our several goals is to always present factual research, nothing more, nothing less. There will be times when you agree with our research findings and there will be times when you have difficulty accepting them.  This is the nature of professionally conducted research.