Author Archive

Federal Bureau of Investigation Facts and Figures

Saturday, December 4th, 2010

Federal Bureau of Investigation Facts & Figures  

Throughout its more than 100-year history, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has protected the American people from threats to our way of life. As some of our greatest threats—gangsters, public corruption, hate crimes, cyber attacks, white-collar fraud, and terrorism—have evolved, the FBI has changed to meet them head-on.

The Bureau’s success has always depended on its agility, its willingness to adapt, and the ongoing dedication of its personnel. But in the years since the tragic attacks of September 11, 2001, the pace of change has been unprecedented. The FBI has adapted to globalization and new technologies. We have developed new capabilities to fight international criminal organizations, sophisticated cyber criminals, fraud that undermines the economy, foreign spies seeking to steal vital secrets and technologies, and terrorists working to commit mass murder.

It is no longer sufficient to investigate crimes after they occur. The stakes are too high and the dangers too great. The FBI must be more predictive and preventive than at any time in its history. We continue to conduct investigations to bring criminals to justice, but we also use an intelligence-driven approach to prevent crimes and acts of terrorism by disrupting and deterring those who would do us harm. Acting within clearly defined constitutional, legal, and policy boundaries, the FBI conducts investigations to build knowledge and develop insight that will provide early warning, direct operations, create opportunities to further cases, and inform national security policymakers.

The FBI’s culture emphasizes strong teamwork and collaboration among colleagues, other government agencies, law enforcement partners, and citizens’ organizations. By working together to effectively share important information and intelligence and reduce bureaucratic obstacles, we move closer to our goal of security for all Americans.

In our second century, the FBI must continue to stand up to the challenge to protect the American people from complex threats in an increasingly interconnected world. As the only member of the U.S. Intelligence Community with broad authority over acts on U.S. soil, it is our duty to protect all Americans by staying ahead of national security threats to the homeland, acting at all times with obedience to the Constitution and with fairness, compassion, integrity, and respect. 

Robert S. Mueller, III
Director

This letter from the Director of the FBI gives you a brief overview of the cutting edge work ongoing within the Bureau.  It is the desire of Criminology Research Project, Inc., to continue to keep you informed of our government’s work in fighting crime.
Dr. Edward Blackwelder

Anti-gay Bullying and Bullying in General

Monday, October 11th, 2010

Several months ago a young student hanged himself in Anniston, Alabama.  It appears this young man had been exposed to repeated bullying by fellow students.  Sadly, this is not an isolated case of suicide brought on, to some extent, from excessive bullying.  It is pointed out that this particular case is not considered anti-gay bullying but bullying nevertheless.

National educational officials are now studying efforts to reduce bullying, especially anti-gay bullying.

Supporters of gay rights say that effective anti-bullying programs should be more specific.  Religious groups, on the other hand, condemn such an approach calling them “unnecessary” and “manipulative” which will tend to sway young pepole’s view of homosexuality.

From research done by Criminology Research Project, Inc., using information gained from varoius studies, it is factual that anti-gay bullying, and bullying in general, is rapidly rising.  Something must be done to stop this dangerous trend.

According to the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network policies must be in place that actually name the specific problem.  CRP, Inc. agrees.

To give an idea as to the frequency of this rising crime CRP, Inc.,  calls your attention to several recent cases.  Rutgers University student Tyler Clementi,  age 18, committed suicide by jumping off the George Washington bridge after learning that his college roommate had recorded him with another male and then broadcast the video online.  Clementi, of course, was not aware that this video was being made.

Justin Aaberg, 15, of Andover, Michigan hanged himself after telling friends of having been bullied.  Five additional students in Aaberg’s Anoka-Hennepin school district killed themselves this past year and it is believed that anti-gay bullying played a role in two of these cases.

In may school districts a policy of “neutrality” is practiced in which classroom discussions pertaining to sexual orientation may have brought about an impression among educators, students and the general public that the educational administration would not aggressively confront the problem.  CRP, Inc., research tends to back this idea.

Vigilant, pro-active adult supervision and intervention must be put into place and actively pursued.  Counselors should received additional specialized training to detect early warning signs of potential bully and have a plan in place to defuse this crisis.  Waiting a time with patience is not the answer.

It seems that the parents of students being bullied are not notified of this abuse for which there is no excuse.  Perhaps school administrators and teachers want to intervene but are unaware of any effective means.  Perhaps these administrators and teachers are merely turning their heads in the hope that the problem will disappear. 

Criminology Research Project, Inc., stands ready to assist educational administrators and teachers in formulating an effective pro-active plan to reduce and, hopefully, eliminate this devastating crisis.

Alabama Federal Corruption Indictments

Monday, October 11th, 2010
Department of Justice Press Release

white spacer
For Immediate Release
October 4, 2010
U.S. Department of Justice
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 514-2007/TDD (202) 514-1888
Alabama Legislators, Staff Member, Lobbyists and Businessmen Charged in 39-Count Indictment for Roles in Wide-Ranging Conspiracy to Influence and Corrupt Votes Related to Electronic Bingo Legislation
Former Lobbyist Pleads Guilty for Her Role in Scheme

WASHINGTON—Eleven individuals, including four current Alabama state legislators, three lobbyists, two business owners and one of their employees, and an employee of the Alabama legislature have been charged for their roles in a conspiracy to offer to and to bribe legislators for their votes and influence on proposed legislation, announced Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division and Assistant Director Kevin Perkins of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division.

The defendants are charged in an indictment returned by a grand jury on Oct. 1, 2010, in Montgomery, Alabama, which was unsealed today. Various defendants are charged with a variety of criminal offenses, including conspiracy, federal program bribery, extortion, money laundering, honest services mail and wire fraud, obstruction of justice and making a false statement. They will make initial appearances today in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama before U.S. Magistrate Judge Terry F. Moorer.

“Today, charges were unsealed against 11 legislators, businessmen, lobbyists and associates who, together, are alleged to have formed a corrupt network whose aim was to buy and sell votes in the Alabama legislature in order to directly benefit the business interests of two defendants, Milton McGregor and Ronald Gilley,” said Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Criminal Division. “The people of Alabama, like all our citizens, deserve to have representatives who act in the public’s interest, not for their own personal financial gain. Vote-buying, like the kind alleged in this indictment, corrodes the public’s faith in our democratic institutions and cannot go unpunished.”

“The allegations in today’s indictment underscore the commitment of the FBI, the Department of Justice, and the Alabama Bureau of Investigation to continue to pursue those in public office who undermine the public’s trust and engage in unethical and corrupt practices,” said Assistant Director Kevin Perkins of the FBI’s Criminal Investigative Division.

According to the indictment, Milton E. McGregor owned a controlling interest in Macon County Greyhound Park Inc., also known as Victoryland, in Macon County, Alabama, and Jefferson Country Racing Association in Jefferson County, Alabama, as well as ownership interest in other entertainment and gambling facilities in Alabama that offered or sought to offer electronic bingo gambling machines to the public. Ronald E. Gilley owned a controlling interest in the Country Crossing real estate, entertainment and gambling development in Houston County, Alabama, which also sought to offer electronic bingo gambling machines to the public.

During the 2009 and 2010 Alabama state legislative sessions, McGregor and Gilley, along with others, allegedly promoted the passage of pro-gambling legislation that would have been favorable to the business interest of individuals operating electronic bingo facilities, including themselves. From February 2009 through August 2010, McGregor, Gilley and their co-defendants allegedly conspired to commit federal program bribery by corruptly giving, offering and agreeing to give money and other things of value to Alabama state legislators and staff with the intent to influence and reward them in connection with pro-gambling legislation. The indictment alleges that Alabama state legislators, including co-defendants State Senator Larry P. Means, State Senator James E. Preuitt, State Senator Quinton T. Ross Jr., and Senator Harri Anne H. Smith corruptly solicited, demanded, accepted and agreed to accept money and things of value from their co-conspirators and others, intending to be influenced and rewarded in connection with pro-gambling legislation.

Specifically, the indictment alleges that Gilley, his primary lobbyist, Jarrod D. Massey, and State Senator Smith, sought to bribe a member of the Alabama House of Representatives during the 2009 legislative session, promising hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign support in exchange for the legislator’s favorable vote on pro-gambling legislation. Similarly, in 2010, McGregor, Gilley and Massey allegedly sought to bribe a member of the Alabama Senate, offering the legislator $1 million, to use at the legislator’s discretion, funneled through a public relations job. According to the indictment, McGregor, along with lobbyist Robert B. Geddie Jr., also provided a $5,000 campaign contribution to a member of the Alabama House of Representatives in exchange for his vote on pro-gambling legislation during the 2010 legislative session.

The indictment also alleges that State Senator Means, who had abstained from an earlier vote on the pro-gambling legislation in 2010, solicited bribes from McGregor, Gilley, Massey and others, and, in one specific instance, sought $100,000 in return for voting in favor of the legislation. According to the indictment, McGregor, his lobbyist Thomas E. Coker, Gilley, Massey, Gilley’s employee Jarrell W. Walker Jr., and others allegedly bribed State Senator Preuitt, who had voted no in the earlier vote on the legislation, promising $2 million in campaign contributions and the use of country music stars in Preuitt’s reelection campaign, among other things of value in exchange for his vote in favor of the pro-gambling legislation. Gilley, Massey, Walker and others also allegedly discussed purchasing a large number of vehicles from Preuitt’s auto dealership in exchange for Preuitt’s vote.

State Senator Ross also is alleged to have solicited significant campaign contributions from McGregor, Gilley, Massey and others. According to the indictment, Ross allegedly pressured McGregor for campaign contributions the day before and the day of the vote on the pro-gambling legislation. In addition, State Senator Smith, who previously introduced an anti-gambling bill during the 2008 legislative session, voted in favor of the pro-gambling legislation in 2010 and allegedly lobbied other legislators to support the legislation in exchange for promises and payments of hundreds of thousands of dollars from Gilley and others. The indictment also alleges that Joseph R. Crosby, an employee of the Alabama Legislative Reference Service who received $3,000 per month from McGregor, took official action on behalf of McGregor, including making changes to the pro-gambling legislation that would benefit McGregor.

In a related case, Jennifer D. Pouncy, 34, of Montgomery, Alabama, pleaded guilty on Sept. 28, 2010, before U.S. Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody to one count of conspiracy for her role in the scheme. According to information stated during her plea hearing, Pouncy admitted that she offered State Senator Preuitt $2 million for his vote on the pro-gambling legislation, based on orders from Massey. Pouncy also admitted that Massey and Gilley authorized her to offer $100,000 to State Senator Means in return for his support for the pro-gambling legislation. Pouncy’s guilty plea was unsealed this morning, and a sentencing date has not been set.

The defendants named in the indictment unsealed today were charged with the following crimes:

  •  
    • Milton E. McGregor, 71, of Montgomery, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, six counts of federal program bribery, and 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud;
    • Ronald E. Gilley, 45, of Enterprise, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, six counts of federal program bribery, 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud, and four counts of money laundering;
    • Jarrod D. Massey, 39, of Montgomery, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, five counts of federal program bribery, and 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud;
    • Thomas E. Coker, 70, of Lowndesboro, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, two counts of federal program bribery, and 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud;
    • Robert B. Geddie Jr., 60, of Montgomery, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, one count of federal program bribery, 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud, and one count of obstruction of justice;
    • Jarrell W. Walker Jr., 36, of Lanett, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, one count of federal program bribery, and 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud;
    • Harri Anne H. Smith, 48, of Slocomb, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, two counts of federal program bribery, one count of extortion, 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud, and four counts of money laundering;
    • Larry P. Means, 63, of Attalla, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, two counts of federal program bribery, two counts of attempted extortion, and 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud;
    • James E. Preuitt, 75, of Talladega, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, one count of federal program bribery, one count of attempted extortion, 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud, and one count of making a false statement;
    • Quinton T. Ross Jr., 41, of Montgomery, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, two counts of federal program bribery, two counts of attempted extortion, and 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud; and
    • Joseph R. Crosby, 61, of Montgomery, Alabama, was charged with one count of conspiracy, one count of federal program bribery, and 11 counts of honest services mail and wire fraud.

The conspiracy charge carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The federal program bribery charges carry a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Each count of extortion, honest services mail and wire fraud, money laundering and obstruction of justice carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The false statement charge carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The indictment also contains a notice of forfeiture as to defendants Smith and Gilley.

An indictment is merely an allegation and defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty in a court of law.

The case is being prosecuted by Senior Deputy Chief Peter J. Ainsworth and Trial Attorneys Eric G. Olshan, Barak Cohen and E. Rae Woods of the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section; Senior Litigation Counsel Brenda K. Morris of the Criminal Division; and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Louis V. Franklin and Steve P. Feaga of the Middle District of Alabama. The case is being supervised by the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section, and is being investigated by the FBI’s Mobile, Alabama, Field Office.

FBI Violent Crime Statistics for 2009

Monday, October 11th, 2010

 

Violent Crime

Definition

In the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, violent crime is composed of four offenses: murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Violent crimes are defined in the UCR Program as those offenses which involve force or threat of force.

Data collection

The data presented in Crime in the United States reflect the Hierarchy Rule, which requires that only the most serious offense in a multiple-offense criminal incident be counted. The descending order of UCR violent crimes are murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, and aggravated assault, followed by the property crimes of burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft. Although arson is also a property crime, the Hierarchy Rule does not apply to the offense of arson.

Overview

  • In 2009, an estimated 1,318,398 violent crimes occurred nationwide, a decrease of
    5.3 percent from the 2008 estimate.
  • When considering 5- and 10-year trends, the 2009 estimated violent crime total was
    5.2 percent below the 2005 level and 7.5 percent below the 2000 level.
  • There were an estimated 429.4 violent crimes per 100,000 inhabitants in 2009.
  • Aggravated assaults accounted for the highest number of violent crimes reported to law enforcement at 61.2 percent. Robbery comprised 31.0 percent of violent crimes, forcible rape accounted for 6.7 percent, and murder accounted for 1.2 percent of estimated violent crimes in 2009.
  • Information collected regarding type of weapon showed that firearms were used in
    67.1 percent of the Nation’s murders, 42.6 percent of robberies, and 20.9 percent of aggravated assaults. (Weapons data are not collected for forcible rape.)

Violent Crime in 2009 Chart

FBI Stories for the Week Ending October 8, 2010

Monday, October 11th, 2010

FBI Stories for the Week Ending October 8, 2010

Washington, D.C. October 08, 2010
  1. San Juan: 89 Law Enforcement Officers, 42 Others Indicted for Drug Trafficking Crimes in Puerto Rico

    Eighty-nine law enforcement officers and 44 others, including national guardsmen and U.S. Army soldiers in Puerto Rico, were charged in 26 indictments unsealed by a grand jury.

  2. Mobile: Alabama Legislators, Staff Member, Lobbyists and Businessmen Charged in 39-Count Indictment for Roles in Wide-Ranging Conspiracy to Influence and Corrupt Votes Related to Electronic Bingo Legislation

    Eleven individuals, including current Alabama state legislators, lobbyists and business owners, were charged for their roles in a conspiracy to offer and bribe legislators for their votes and influence on proposed legislation.
  3.  New York: Faisal Shahzad Sentenced in Manhattan Federal Court to Life in Prison for Attempted Car Bombing in Times Square

    Faisal Shahzad was sentenced to life in prison in Manhattan federal court for his attempt to detonate a car bomb in Times Square on May 1, 2010.

  4. Phoenix: Three Life Sentences for Brutal Murder in Gila River Indian Community

    Eugene Joseph Escalanti was sentenced to three concurrent life sentences for first-degree murder charges, kidnapping and felony murder.

  5. Sacramento: Four Fresno Police Officers Indicted for Civil Rights Charges

    A federal grand jury returned an indictment charging former Fresno, Calif., Police Department (FPD) Officers Christopher Coleman, 42; Paul Van Dalen, 44; and Sean Plymale, 41; and current FPD Sergeant Michael Manfredi, 50, with civil rights and obstruction of justice offenses related to the assault of a man in their custody in October 2005.

  6. Boston: Employee Charged with Seeking to Provide Confidential Business Information to a Foreign Government

    Elliot Doxer, an employee of a high-technology company headquartered in Cambridge, Mass., was arrested and charged in federal court with secretly providing confidential business information over an 18-month period to a person he believed to be an agent of a foreign government. Doxer worked in the finance department of Cambridge-based Akamai Technologies Inc., a provider of Internet content delivery services.

  7. Springfield: Fairview Heights Man Indicted on Explosive, Threat Charges

    Roman O. Conaway was charged in a two-count indictment for making a false threat to detonate an explosive device and influencing a federal officer by threat.

  8. Los Angeles: Former Top Official with Inland Empire Indian Tribe Pleads Guilty, Admits Taking Nearly $875,000 in Bribes

    The former chairman of the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians pleaded guilty to federal charges for accepting approximately $875,000 in bribes from tribal vendors and concealing that income from the Internal Revenue Service.

  9. Atlanta: Pharmaceutical Company Allergan Pleads Guilty; Sentenced to a Pay a Total of $375 Million

    Allergan, Inc. pleaded guilty and was sentenced to pay $375 million for its unlawful marketing and promotion of its product, Botox® Therapeutic for uses not approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration. San Antonio: Austin Area Man Sentenced in Cyanide Hoax Case

    Gary Dale Horton of Jonestown, Texas, was sentenced to two years in federal prison in connection with a cyanide hoax in May 2010.Criminology Research Project, Inc., thanks the Federal Bureauu of Investigation for this information.  For details of each case contact the FBI or Criminology Research Project, Inc.

 

Cyber Bust

Saturday, October 9th, 2010

The cyber thieves were smart. Instead of targeting corporations and large banks that had state-of-the-art online security, they went after the accounts of medium-sized companies, towns, and even churches. Before they were caught, members of the theft ring managed to steal $70 million.

Today, with our law enforcement partners in the United States, the United Kingdom, Ukraine, and the Netherlands,  announced the execution of numerous arrests and search warrants in multiple countries in one of the largest cyber criminal cases we ever investigated.

  Cyber Graphic

“This was a major theft ring,” said Gordon Snow, assistant director of the FBI’s Cyber Division. “Global criminal activity on this scale is a threat to our financial infrastructure, and it can only be effectively countered through the kind of international cooperation we have seen in this case.”

Using a Trojan horse virus known as Zeus, hackers in Eastern Europe infected computers around the world. The virus was carried in an e-mail, and when targeted individuals at businesses and municipalities opened the e-mail, the malicious software installed itself on the victimized computer, secretly capturing passwords, account numbers, and other data used to log into online banking accounts.

The hackers used this information to take over the victims’ bank accounts and make unauthorized transfers of thousands of dollars at a time, often routing the funds to other accounts controlled by a network of “money mules.” Many of the U.S. money mules were recruited from overseas. They created bank accounts using fake documents and phony names. Once the money was in their accounts, the mules could either wire it back to their bosses in Eastern Europe, or turn it into cash and smuggle it out of the country. For their work, they were paid a commission.

Yesterday, the New York office arrested 10 subjects related to the case, and is seeking 17 others. Those arrested are charged with using hundreds of false-name bank accounts to receive more than $3 million from victimized accounts.

In all, the global theft ring attempted to steal some $220 million, and was actively involved in using Zeus to infect more computers. But beyond the actual and potential monetary loss, this case is significant because of the extraordinary level of cooperation among international law enforcement to stop the group. And it also sends a message to hackers around the world that there are fewer safe havens from which they can operate.

“There are many challenges in a complicated global case like this one,” said Weysan Dun, special agent in charge of our Omaha office, where the investigation began in May 2009 when agents discovered a pattern of suspicious banking transactions. “With multiple countries involved, there are differences in times zones, geography, and culture, not to mention that all our cyber laws are not the same. “But those differences were overcome,” Dun said, “and the results speak for themselves.”

He added, “The international tolerance for this kind of criminal activity is decreasing. Our partners overseas are dealing more aggressively and effectively with cybercrime than ever before. The number of nations that collaborated and worked in partnership with the Bureau on this case represents a very significant step forward in the way we investigate these cases.”

Criminology Research Project, Inc., congratulates the FBI’s Cyber Division for a job well done.

Dr. Edward Blackwelder

Executive Director

Criminology Research Project, Inc.

Pizza Hut and Gun Regulation

Saturday, October 9th, 2010

It seems that the parent company of Pizza Hut has an employment requirement that pizza delivery personnel cannot carry weapons for self-protection.  I don’t argue that this company has every right to have any regulation it wishes.

However, recently, a Pizza Hut delivery person returned to his store after having delivered a pizza only to face two armed robbers who threatened both him and the store manager.  The delivery person pulled his weapon and “brought down” at least one of the robbers; ultimately saving the life of the manager and himself. 

While corporate headquarter should be bestowing some type reward upon on this responsive employee he was, instead, terminated from his employment with Pizza Hut!

I am not necessarily anti-gun in attitude at all, in fact, I believe that an individual has a constitutional right to protect himself, his family and his property.  True, the delivery person did violate an employment regulation but the result was positive—he saved two lives!

A company, such as Pizza Hut, can have as many regulations as it wishes but I, the customer, will be the final decision maker as to whether I will frequent a Pizza Hut in the future.  Believe me,  I won’t!

Let’s control guns, certainly, but let’s be reasonable as well.  I do know that when a person is known to be armed that person drastically reduces the likelihood of being robbed, even murdered.  Such was the case not far from the city limits of Piedmont, Alabama, not long ago.  A lady, in the middle of the night, heard someone breaking into her residence.   Having a legal weapon she fired at the burglar.  This burglar didn’t survive.

Good for the lady!  I’m willing to wager that the next potential burglar will think twice before he/she attempts to burglarize this particular residence.

Dr. Edward Blackwelder

Executive Director

Criminology Research Project, Inc.

Gun Laws: Good or Bad?

Saturday, October 9th, 2010

Guns used in crimes is big business in many states including Alabama.   Alabama, in fact, is among our nation’s leaders in this type export—guns being shipped into the state for retain sale.

A valid report indicates that Alabama is the fifth largest per capita supplier of guns used in crimes in other states.  Again, thank goodness for Mississippi, as it is the leading gun supplier.  Georgia, Virginia, South Caroline, and Kentucky, all Southern states, are also among the top ten.

Mayors Against Illegal Guns indicates that 1,561 guns sold in Alabama were used in crimes in other states last year alone.  According to MAIG this indicates a statistic of 33.2 Alabama guns used in crimes for every 100,ooo Alabama citizens which is alot higher that the 14.1 gens per 100,000 for the nation overall.

The Mayors Against Illegal Guns has come out as stating that Alabama is a “supermarket for guns.”  MAIG has come up with a number of options to curb this trend such as making it illegal for someone to purchase a gun for someone else who is, for whatever reason, not qualified by law to make the gun person himself, background check requirements before taking possession of the firearm, requiring gun permits for all handguns, requiring the reporting of lost or stolen guns to law enforcement, and allowing law enforcement to inspect gun dealerships. There is not wrong with any of these ideas afterall, if one has noting to hide why not?

It is important, I must point out, that the public has a constitution right to possess arms however there must be ways to keep these guns away from criminals.  The difficult question is, “Where is the balance?”

Criminology Research Project, Inc., goes not  take a stand on this issue but offers information and research that will enable the seriously minded citizen to know the facts.  It is then the duty of this citizen to vote appropriately.

Dr. Edward Blackwelder

Executive Director

Criminology Research Project, Inc.

Corruption in Alabama runs rampant or so it appears

Saturday, October 9th, 2010

I was somewhat taken back, certainly not shocked, a few day ago when I first learned that eleven individuals, dog track owner Milton McGregor among them, were arrested after a federal investigation regarding gambling legislation.

Federal agents arrested, in addition to McGregor, four state senators, three lobbyists and one legislative staffer in addition to the developer of Country Crossings, a gambling establishment, Ronnie Gilley.  McGregor is a prominent state dog track owner and operator.

The federal indictments, thirty-nine in all, focused on alleged corruption surrounding efforts to pass what became known as “Sweet Home Alabama” legislation to legalize electronic bingo.  Various charges, including bribery, conspiracy and fraud were among these indictments. 

This senario begs the question, “What is the difference in a political contribution and corruption?”  All candidates seemingly accept political contributions–completely legal—and are allowed to use these so-called contributions to their sole discretion.  At exactly what point a contribution becomes a bribe is the question that must be answered.  Bribes, of course, are contributions that cause a politician to vote a particular way or to, at least, take action that will assure the probability of a piece of legislation being passed into law or defeated.   Never doubt that “legal” contributions  do, in fact,  create a climate where the receiving politician votes a particular way on a particular bill or series of bills.  This fact is certainly not rocket science but is a matter-of-fact way of life in most all politics.

I citizen has a right to an opinion as to the “good” or “bad” of legalized gambling, mostly bingo in Alabama, but bribing a public servant to vote a particular way is beyond the pale—it’s illegal!

As will all arrested individuals, those arrested in this instance are to be assumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and to a moral certainly.  Having said this, it does seem unusual that so much smoke for such an extended period of time coming from Alabama’s statehouse seems to indicate a certain amount of fire.

If the accused and arrested are found guilty they should be punished to the fullest extent of the law just as would any ordinary citizen, possibly even more so.  Elected officials should maintain a higher standard than the average citizen due to the authority and power that accompanies the position.

“Scared” is an appropriate term that most probably is being spoken, or at least thought, in the minds of many more politicaians in Alabama and other states as well.  It’s long been known that morality cannot be legislated but, one thing for sure, the voters should study the candidates for each elected office and vote their convictions.  These convictions, it is hoped, will be for transparency in governemnt, voting the will of the people, and good moral decision making—something tht is foreign to Alabama politics.

Making a clean sweep of all incumbents seems to be the order of the day and may not be a bad idea.  Certainly, some honest, well-meaning office holders will be caught up in the broad brushing but such is a way of life. 

Crime is crime whether it be murder or that considered more subtle while collar and, if convicted, those found guilty to be given time to meditate upon their conduct in government provided housing more commonly known as prison.

Journalist Brett Buckner Honored

Saturday, October 9th, 2010

Criminology Research Project, Inc., is proud to learn that journalist Brett Buckner was recently awarded a 2010 American Academy of Religion Awards for his most professional reporting on religion.

Mr. Buckner wrote an article entitled, the preacher and the Predators, for The Anniston Star (October 18, 2009) on Criminology Research Project, Inc., Executive Director, Dr. Edward Blackwelder’s long time ministry to prison inmates and inmate families.  Buckner’s article detailed the numerous infamous serial killers that Dr. Blackwelder had worked with over many years, an article that has been quoted in many criminology class rooms throughout the nation as pointing out that “regeneration,” not “rehabilitation” is the secret to lowering the recedivism rate among our nation’s prison population.

Brett Buchner is commended for his excellent work.  He is a true professional in every respect and deserves recognition of the highest standard.  Brett, according to Criminology Research Project, Inc., Executive Director,  Dr. Edward Blackwelder, “second to none in quality jornalism and will become more and more familiar to the reading public in years to come.”

Criminology Research Project, Inc., congratuates Brett Buckner on having been awarded this most prestegious award.