Author Archive

Federal Bureau of Investigation – Top Ten Most Wanted

Friday, March 19th, 2010
FBI Seal Federal Bureau of Investigation Links to FBI home page, site map and Frequently asked questions
Federal Bureau of Investigation

Home Site Map FAQs Skip to Main Content

Contact Us
Bullet Your Local FBI Office
Bullet Overseas Offices
Bullet Submit a Crime Tip
Bullet Report Internet Crime
Bullet More Contacts
Learn About Us
Bullet Quick Facts
Bullet What We Investigate
Bullet Natl. Security Branch
Bullet Information Technology
Bullet Fingerprints & Training
Bullet Laboratory Services
Bullet Reports & Publications
Bullet History
Bullet More About Us
Get Our News
Bullet Press Room
Bullet E-mail Updates Red Envelope
Bullet News Feeds XML Icon
Be Crime Smart
Bullet Wanted by the FBI
Bullet More Protections
Use Our Resources
Bullet For Law Enforcement
Bullet For Communities
Bullet For Researchers
Bullet More Services 
Visit Our Kids’ Page
 Apply for a Job
 

Ten Most Wanted Fugitives

 
March 14, 2010 marks the 60th Anniversary of the FBI’s “Ten Most Wanted Fugitives” list. View information regarding the current Top Tenners.60th anniversary of the Top Ten List collage

UPDATE: INTERNET CRIMES -Internet Crimes Complaint Center & Federal Bureau of Investigation Report

Thursday, March 18th, 2010
This information is from the Internet Crimes Complaint Center and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and is presented by Criminology Research Project, Inc., for your academic enrichment only.  All credit for this article goes to the Internet Crimes Complaint Center and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  Criminology Research Project thanks the people of the Internet Crimes Complaint Center and the Federal Bureau of Investigation for making this report available.  It is the desire of CRP that you possess the most up-to-date information available on this most rapidly growing criminological problem.  You are encouraged to visit the Internet Crimes Complaint Center’s web-site for a more detailed and complete report.

 

 

 
2009 Internet Crime Report

Executive Summary

From January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) Web site received 336,655 complaint submissions. This was a 22.3% increase as compared to 2008 when 275,284 complaints were received. Of the 336,655 complaints submitted to IC3, 146,663 were referred to local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies around the country for further consideration. The vast majority of referred cases contained elements of fraud and involved a financial loss by the complainant. The total dollar loss from all referred cases was $559.7 million with a median dollar loss of $575. This is up from $264.6 million in total reported losses in 2008. Unreferred submissions generally involved complaints in which there was no documented harm or loss (e.g., a complainant received a fraudulent solicitation email but did not act upon it) or complaints where neither the complainant nor perpetrator resided within the United States (i.e., there was not an appropriate domestic law enforcement agency for direct referral).
Complaints received by IC3 cover many different fraud and non-fraud categories, including auction fraud, non-delivery of merchandise, credit card fraud, computer intrusions, spam/unsolicited email, and child pornography. All of these complaints are accessible to local, state, and federal law enforcement to support active investigations, trend analysis, and public outreach and awareness efforts.

On January 1, 2009, IC3 implemented a new complaint classification system based on a redesigned questionnaire that generates an automatic classification of the complaint into one of 79 offense-based categories. This redesign also resulted in a number of changes to the way the system gathers and classifies complaint data. Further information about these changes can be found in Appendix I of this report. Significant findings related to an analysis of the complaint data include:

Email scams that used the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) name (schemes in which the scammer pretended • to be affiliated with the FBI in an effort to gain information from the target) represented 16.6% of all complaints submitted to IC3. Non-delivered merchandise and/or payment (in which either a seller did not ship the promised item or a buyer did not pay for an item) accounted for 11.9% of complaints. Advance fee fraud (a scam wherein the target is asked to give money upfront- often times- for some reward that never materializes) made up 9.8% of complaints. Identity theft and overpayment fraud (scams in which the target is given a fraudulent monetary instrument in excess of the agreed-upon amount for the transaction, and asked to send back the overpayment using a legitimate monetary instrument) round out the top five categories of all complaints submitted to IC3 during the year.

Of the top five categories of offenses reported to law enforcement during 2009, non-delivered merchandise and/or • payment ranked 19.9%; identity thieft, 14.1%; credit card fraud, 10.4%; auction fraud, 10.3%; and computer fraud (destruction/damage/vandalism of property), 7.9%.

Of the complaints involving financial harm that were referred to law enforcement, the highest median dollar losses were • found among investment fraud ($3,200), overpayment fraud ($2,500), and advance fee fraud ($1,500) complainants.

In those complaints in which perpetrator information is provided, 76.6% were male and half resided in one of the • following states: California, Florida, New York, the District of Columbia, Texas, and Washington. The majority of reported perpetrators (65.4%) were from the United States. A number of perpetrators were also in the United Kingdom, Nigeria, Canada, Malaysia, and Ghana.

Among complainants, 54% were male, nearly two-thirds were between the ages of 30 and 50, and a little over one-• third resided in one of the following states: California, Florida, Texas, or New York. The majority of complainants were from the United States (92%). However, IC3 received a number of complaints originating in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, India, and Puerto Rico.

Male complainants lost more money than female complainants (ratio of $1.51 lost per male to every $1.00 lost per • female). Individuals 40-49 years of age reported, on average, higher amounts of loss than other age groups.

In addition to FBI scams, popular scam trends for 2009 included hitman scams, astrological reading frauds, • economic scams, job site scams, and fake pop-up ads for antivirus software.

 
 

Overview

The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) began operation on May 8, 2000, as the Internet Fraud Complaint Center. Established as a partnership between the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), IC3 serves as a vehicle to receive, develop, and refer criminal complaints regarding the rapidly expanding arena of cybercrime. Since inception, IC3 has received complaints across a wide spectrum of cybercrime matters, including online fraud (in its many forms), intellectual property rights (IPR) matters, computer intrusions (hacking), economic espionage (theft of trade secrets), child pornography, international money laundering, identity theft, and a growing list of additional criminal and civil matters.
IC3 gives the victims of cybercrime a convenient and easy-to-use reporting mechanism that alerts authorities of suspected criminal or civil violations. For law enforcement and regulatory agencies at the local, state, and federal level, IC3 provides a central referral mechanism for complaints involving Internet-related crimes. For affected members of industry, IC3 can leverage both intelligence and subject matter expert resources to identify and craft an aggressive, proactive approach to combating cybercrime.

IC3 2009 Internet Crime Report is the ninth annual compilation of information on complaints received by IC3 and referred to law enforcement or regulatory agencies for appropriate action. The results provide an examination of key characteristics of: (1) complaints; (2) perpetrators; (3) complainants; (4) interaction between perpetrators and complainants; (5) popular scams of 2009; and (6) success stories involving complaints referred by IC3. The results in this report are intended to enhance general knowledge about the scope and prevalence of cybercrime in the United States. This report does not represent all victims of Internet crime, or crime in general because it is derived solely from the people who filed a report with IC3.

General IC3 Filing Informat
 
 

The number of complaints referred to law enforcement has increased from 72,940 in 2008 to 146,663 in 2009 (see Figure 3). All complaints not directly referred are still accessible by law enforcement, used for trend analysis, intelligence gathering and consumer education. Typically, these non-referred complaints do not involve a documented case of financial or physical harm or involve a situation in which neither the complainant nor perpetrator reside within the United States. In a minority of cases, there is no designated agency to refer a complaint, based on jurisdictional factors or agency-defined thresholds for referral.

During 2009, IC3 implemented a new complaint classification system. This complainant-driven system is based on a logic-driven questionnaire that generates an automatic classification of the complaint into one of 79 offense-based categories. This redesign has also resulted in a number of changes to the way IC3 system gathers and classifies complaint data. The new classification system improves upon the previous system by making clearer distinctions between complaint elements and by reducing the number of categories used to classify complaints.

The results contained in this report were based on information that was provided to IC3 through the complaint forms submitted at

www.ic3.gov. Complainants without Internet access are advised to use resources at their local library, educational institution, local law enforcement agency, or local victim’s assistance office. After a complaint is filed with IC3, the information is automatically referred to the appropriate local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.www.ic3.gov. The data represents both a complete analysis of all the complaints and a sub-sample of those complaints that have been referred to law enforcement. Although IC3’s primary mission is to serve as a vehicle to receive, develop, and refer criminal complaints regarding cybercrime, those complaints involving other types of crime such as telephone and mail contact were also referred.4 | Internet Crime Complaint Center Figure 1: Yearly Comparison of Complaints Received via the IC3 Web site
From January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009, there were 336,655 total complaints filed with IC3 (see Figure 1). This is a 22.3% increase compared to 2008 when 275,284 complaints were received. The number of complaints filed per month, for 2009, averaged 28,055. Dollar loss of complaints referred to law enforcement was at an all time high in 2009, $559.7 million, compared to previous years (see Figure 2).050,000100,000150,000200,000250,000300,000350,000200020012002200320042005200620072008200916,83850,41275,064124,515207,449231,49207,492206,884275,284336,655

Figure 2: Yearly Dollar Loss (in millions) of Referred Complaints
$0$100$200$300$400$500$6002001$17.8$54.0$125.6$68.1$183.1$198.4$239.1$264.6$559.720022003200420052006200720082009

Figure 3: Yearly Number of Referrals
030,00060,00090,000120,000150,0002001200220032004200520062007200820094,81048,25270,553103,95996,73186,27990,00872,940146,6632009 

Complaint Characteristics

During 2009, email scams that used the FBI’s name was the offense most often reported to IC3, comprising 16.6% of all crime complaints. Non-delivery of merchandise and/or payment represented 11.9% of complaints. Advance fee fraud made up an additional 9.8% of complaints. Other top 10 complaint categories included identity theft (8.2%), overpayment fraud (7.3%), miscellaneous fraud (6.3%), spam (6.2%), credit card fraud (6.0%), auction fraud (5.7%), and destruction/damage/vandalism of computer property, (i.e.,”computer damage,” 4.5%) (see Figure 4).
The complaints referred to law enforcement by IC3 were largely those cases involving identifiable loss. That meant certain complaints received in high numbers (e.g., FBI scams) were referred in lower numbers because the complainant’s intent was to notify IC3 of the scam, rather than report a financial or physical loss.

For a more detailed explanation of complaint categories used by IC3, refer to Appendix I at the end of this report.

Complaint category statistics may not always produce an accurate picture of what is occurring. They are based on the perception of consumers, and are thus influenced by how the complainant characterizes their victimization. Two different people may describe the same victimization in very different ways.

A key area of interest regarding Internet fraud is the average monetary loss incurred by complainants contacting IC3. Such information is valuable because it provides a foundation for estimating average Internet fraud losses in the general population. To present information on average losses, two forms of averages are offered: the mean and the median. The mean represents a form of averaging familiar to the public: the total dollar amount divided by the number of complaints. Because the mean can be sensitive to a small number of extremely high or extremely low loss complaints, the median is also provided. The median represents the 50

th percentile, or midpoint, of all loss amounts for all complaints referred to law enforcement. The median is less susceptible to extreme cases, whether high or low amounts lost.

Figure 4: 2009 Top 10 Most Common IC3 Complaint Categories (Percent of Total Complaints Received)
0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%FBI ScamsNon-Delivery Merchandise/PaymentAdvanced Fee FraudIdentity TheftOverpayment FraudMiscellaneous FraudsSpamCredit Card FraudAuction FraudComputer Damage16.6%11.9%9.8%8.2%7.3%6.3%6.2%6.0%5.7%4.5%6 | Internet Crime Complaint Center

Of the 146,663 referrals during 2009, 100,296 involved a victim who reported a monetary loss. The total dollar loss from all cases of fraud in 2009 that were referred to law enforcement by IC3 was $559.7 million; that loss was greater than 2008 when a total loss of $264.6 million was reported. Much of this increase can be attributable to a greater number of higher loss complaint categories (e.g., identity theft) relative to auction fraud, which historically has been among lowest loss offenses. Of those complaints reporting monetary loss that were referred to law enforcement, the mean dollar loss was $5,580 and the median was $575. The significant difference between the mean and median losses is reflected by a small number of cases in which hundreds of thousands of dollars were reported to have been lost by the complainant.
Over 20 percent (21.7%) of complaints referred to law enforcement involved losses of less than $100, and 36.7% reported a loss between $100 and $1,000. Just over 28 percent (28.3%) of the complaints referred to law enforcement reported losses between $1,000 and $5,000 (for a grand total of 86.7% of complaints referred to law enforcement showing a loss of $5,000 or less), and 13.4% indicated a loss greater than $5,000 (see Figure 6). The highest dollar loss per referred incident was reported by overpayment fraud (median loss of $2,500) complainants. Investment fraud (median loss of $1,857) and advance fee fraud (median loss of $1,500) complainants were other high dollar loss categories.

Figure 5: 2009 Top 10 Most Referred IC3 Complaint Categories (Percent of Total Complaints Referred)
0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%Non-deliveryIdentity TheftCredit/Debit Card FraudAuction FraudMiscellaneous FraudsAdvanced FeeOverpayment FraudFBI ScamsSpamComputer Damage19.9%14.1%10.4%10.3%7.9%5.7%4.8%4.5%4.3%3.5%

Figure 6: Percent of Referrals by Monetary Loss
$100,000.00 and over$10,000 to $99,999.99$5,000 to $9,999.99$1,000 to $4,999.99$100 to $999.99$0.01 to $99.99

1%28.3%36.7%21.7%6.5%5.8%2009  Perpetrator Characteristics

As important as it is to understand the prevalence and monetary impact of cybercrime, it is also vital to gain insight into who the typical perpetrators are. This can prove to be difficult in the world of cybercrime, where a mask of anonymity can impede law enforcement efforts; the gender of the perpetrator was reported only 35.1% of the time, and the state of residence for domestic perpetrators was reported only 38.0% of the time. In those cases in which a complainant was able to provide information about the suspect, over 76% of the perpetrators were male and over half resided in: California, Florida, New York, Texas, Washington and the District of Columbia (see Map 1). The District of Columbia, Nevada, Washington, Montana, Utah, and Florida have the highest per capita rate of perpetrators in the United States (see Table 1). Perpetrators also have been identified as residing in the United Kingdom, Nigeria, Canada, Malaysia, and Ghana (see Map 2). Refer to Appendix III at the end of this report for more information about perpetrator statistics by state. Readers are cautioned to note that throughout this document, perpetrator demographics represents information provided to the victim by the perpetrator so actual perpetrator statistics may vary greatly.

Table 1: Perpetrators per 100,000 People*
 

 

Rank  

State  

Per 100,000 People  

1  

District of Columbia  

116.00  

2  

Nevada  

106.73  

3  

Washington  

81.33  

4  

Montana  

68.20  

5  

Utah  

60.22  

6  

Florida  

57.28  

7  

Georgia  

56.99  

8  

Wyoming  

56.40  

9  

North Dakota  

51.01  

10  

New York  

48.10  

Liberty Chaplain Ministries Expands It’s Ministry Programs

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

Liberty Chaplain Ministries and it’s several specialized ministry programs are growing by leaps and bounds.  The LCM web-site is currently being updated with these new programs available for review soon.

Liberty Chaplain Ministries telephone number is (256) 447-0040.  If all ministry volunteers are currently assisting other callers when you contact the ministry you may leave your name, telephone number, and short message and your call will be returned as soon as possible.

A trained Pastoral counselor is available, at no cost, to you by calling the Liberty Chaplain Ministries main telephone number.  This LCM Pastoral counseling ministry is growing and offers one-on-one spiritual counseling, totally confidential, to anyone.

“Faith By Phone” is now available.   You may dial (708) 838-1100, extention 1064, to hear this constantly changing devotional 24 hours a day.   “Faith By Phone” is a ministry of Liberty Chaplain Ministries. 

Liberty Godparent Home, a ministry of Thomas Road Baptist Church, Lynchburg, Virginia, is now accessable through Liberty Chaplain Ministries.  This Piedmont, Alabamaa, based Christian ministry will pay for the transporation of any pregnant girl to Lynchburg for admission into the Liberty Godparent Home program.

You are encouraged to visit the Liberty Chaplain Ministries web-site for information on Liberty Godparent Home.

If you are interested in receiving Devotional With Dr. Edward Blackwelder, on-line, Monday-Friday, you can sign up by contacting Liberty Chaplain Ministries at:  LibertyChaplain@aol.com and requesting that your e-mail address be added to the devotional mailing list.

Deadly Little Secret to be published soon

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

Deadly Little Secret, the true crime story of the Heath Stock’s triple murders of his parents and teenaged sister will be in our nation’s bookstores in the not-to-distant future.

The final manuscript has been completed, photographs assembled and updates written.  Check this Criminology Research Project, Inc., web-site for details as to the release date, date, time and location of the first “signing” party and how you can purchase the book at a bargain price directly from CRP.

Eagle Scout and triple murderer-Heath Carlton Stocks

Wayne B. Williams Update

Sunday, March 7th, 2010

A two hour documentary on The Atlanta Child Murders is nearing completion.  CNN will air this intense investigative report by mid year. 

Criminology Research Project, Inc. will make every effort to keep you posted as to date and time of this CNN documentary.

Wayne Williams continues to live his life behind bars in Hancock State Prison located in Sparta, Georgia.  He remains hopeful that a successful appeal will be forth coming as a result of revelations that may come as a result of this CNN documentary.

It’s been 28 years since William’s Atlanta trial…minds have changed as to his guilt…new evidence may have surfaced and what were regular low level investigators are now in positions of authority and are stating that Wayne Williams is not the serial killer that roamed the Atlanta metropolitan area in the late ’70’s and early ’80’s.

Only Wayne Williams knows whether he is this infamous serial killer; what is known is that he did not get a fair and impartial criminal trial, something every citizen deserves.

Former Mobster Speaks on Evils of Gambling and Crime

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Michael Franzese, a former mobster, spoke to the University of Alabama student body on Monday, January 25th, at Coleman Coliseum about the dangers of gambling.  Franzese said gambling can become a serious addiction, similar to drugs, pronography, and alcohol.  This former mobster pointed out the warning signs as being the loss of concentration, thinking about gambling during classes and losing a great deal of money.

Franzsese’s father was an underboss in the Colombo family in New York.  He stated that it was common for police cars to follow his family and that he grew up hating the police.

As for gambling, Franzese said online gambling has become very popular and that people may not realize that it is illegal since people rerely report the Web sites to law enforcement officials.  He made the statement, “If you’re gambling online, you’re involved involved in criminal activity.”  Franzese made a point that athletes should be especially careful.  He said more people gamble on men’s basketball than on the Super Bowl.  He stated that people who are betting on a game might ask players to give them inside information or to play poorly.  Once a player starts doing this, Franzese said, “the player can’t get out of it.  Guys on the streets are like leeches, man.  They don’t let go.”

This infamous mobster said that Nevada is ranked first in gambling, suicide, addiction, divorce and women murdered by men.  This, he said, shows what happens when gambling becomes a problem. 

Franzese spent eight years in prison and said that over 2.5 million people are currently incarcerated in state and federal penal institutions with more going to prison everyday as a result of gambling.

Society would be better off without gambling, for this there is no doubt.  Nevertheless, gambling exists therefore one must decide the best alternative to keep the resulting crime rates to a minimum.  Should society legalize gambling, control it severely, and reap any money that may result from it?

I have long subscribed to the theory that society cannot legislate morality and I continue to believe this today.  The evidence cannot be disputed that areas that have legalized gambling also have higher crime rates, larger numbers of people eating a community food kitchens and a much hight rate of child abuse.

I don’t have the answer but I do know that society breeds criminality and it appears that gambling contributes to this criminality;

Dr. Edward Blackwelder

Cyber Crime-The Internet-Your Computer and You

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

The Internet has thrown wide the windows of the world, allowing us to learn and communicate and conduct business in ways that were unimaginable 20 years ago.  This is the upside of globalization, as  author Tom Friedman has noted in best-sellers such as The World is Flat.  The downside of our increasingly flat world is that the Internet is not just a conduit for commerce, but also a conduit for crime.

The Internet has created virtual doors into our lives, our finances, our businesses, and our national security. Criminals, spies, and terrorists are testing our doorknobs every day, looking for a way in.

Cyber crime is a nebulous concept.  It is difficult to grasp intangible threats, and easy to dismiss them as unlikely to happen to you.  So far, too little attention has been paid to cyber threats—and their consequences.

Have you ever though of strangers walking through your offices, homes, and dorm rooms?  What if they were opening drawers, reading your files, accessing your bank accounts, or stealing your company’s research and development?

Friends, this is happening at this very moment!  Intruders are reading our mail and hacking into our networks every day, looking for valuable information,.  Unfortunately, they are finding all of this because many of us are not aware of the threat these people pose to our privacy, our economic stability, and even our national security.

Most of us, including myself, assume that we will not be targets of cyber crime.  We, as a result, are not as careful as we know we should be.  The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Robert S. Mueller,III tells this true story; Not long ago, the head of one of our nation’s domestic agencies received an e-mail purporting to be from his bank.  It looked perfectly legitimate, and asked him to verify some information.  He started to follow the instructions, but realized this might not be such a good idea.  It turned out that he was just a few clicks away from falling into a classic Internet “phishing” scam.  This is someone who spends a good deal of his professional life warning others about the perils of cyber crime!  He, however, barely caught himself in time.  Director Mueller knows this is a true story as this person!

In July of 2008, a California oil and gas company called Pacific Energy Resources contacted the FBI and the Long Beach Police Department to report a computer attack.  Six computer servers had been rendered inoperable, disabling the critical leak-detection systems of three off-shore oil platforms.  This was the last in a series of network attacks which cost the company over $100,000 in losses.’’   An investigation led the FBI to a former IT contractor.  After he had been dismissed from his job, he retaliated by remotely accessing the computer system.  His actions could potentially have resulted in significant environmental damage. He pled guilty to a federal computer intrusion charge and faces up to 10 years in prison.

This past April, someone hacked into the database of the Virginia Department of Health Professionals.  The intruder blocked over 8 million patient records—records that hospitals, doctors, and pharmacies depend on in order to accurately prescribe and dispense medication.  Those records are no longer blocked and the FBI continues to investigate.

In the book, The Cuckoo’s Egg, the author chronicles the electronic adventure of Cliff Stoll, a systems manager at a Berkeley laboratory.  In the mid-1980s, he noticed an accounting disparity of 75 cents.  This was before the Internet as we know it today.  He tracked it to an unauthorized user who had repeatedly broken into the system and then used the lab’s computers to tap into military networks.  He eventually traced the attacks to a German hacker who was part of an espionage ring.  The book was prescient.  Twenty years later the entire world is online.  Because the web offers near-total anonymity it is much more difficult to discern the identity, motives, and location of an intruder.

In an early stage investigation it is not known if the problem is the dealing with a spy, a company insider, or an organized criminal group.  Something that looks like an ordinary phishing scam may be an attempt by a terrorist group to raise funding for an operation.  An intrusion into a corporate network could be the work of a high school hacker across the street or it could be a hostile foreign power across the globe.

Cyber threats present a unique challenge to law enforcement because so little is known and, equally, there is a tendency for investigators to compartmentalize an early investigation.  Criminal cases are usually separate from espionage cases, which in turn are separate from counterterrorism cases.  When it come to cyber threats, however, there is almost always some overlap.

It is the job of the FBI to serve both as a law enforcement and national security agency.  This is critical because what may start as a criminal investigation may lead to a national security threat.

Part 2 of this series continues tomorrow.  (CRP wishes to recognize the research efforts of the FBI in making this article possible)

Liberty Chaplain Ministries

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Liberty Chaplain Ministries is a faith based religious organization under IRS 501(C)(3) and offers a variety of spiritually based ministries.  You are encouraged to visit the Liberty Chaplain Ministries web-site at: www.libertychaplainministries.org.  Pastoral counseling is available as are various study materials, all at no cost.  Liberty Chaplain Ministries Senior Chaplain is a member of the American Association of Christian Counselors.

Crime and Religion: Is There A Connection?

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

Criminology Research Project, Inc makes an attempt to cover the varied areas of criminology.  Today, many individuals are studying crime and it’s relationship to a Biblical foundation therefore CRP will offer studies, comparisons, ideas of experts, and opinions based on Scripture as each relates to crime, sociology, ethics, folkways, and mores.

Criminology Research Project, Inc encourages you to visit www.libertychaplainministries.org for additional information and insight into crime, government, and theology.

Paxil and the Risk of Heart Defects: FDA Advisement

Saturday, January 30th, 2010

FDA Has Advised: Risk of Heart Defects with Paxil

Paxil has been linked to numerous birth defects. Heart defects including atrial and ventricular septal defects have been linked with Paxil use during the first trimester of pregnancy. According to two studies, women who took the antidepressant Paxil during their first trimester of pregnancy were one and a half to two times more likely to have a baby born with a heart defect than women on other antidepressants or women in the general population. These studies reported mostly atrial and ventricular septal defects, which are holes in heart’s chamber walls. The right and left atria are separated from each other by a septum; one side contains oxygen-rich blood and the other oxygen-poor blood, and the septum keeps these chambers separate. A defect in the septum may need to be repaired surgically and can be life threatening.

Other Paxil Birth Defects

  • Atrial and Ventricular Septal Defects
  • Lung Disorder
  • Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn

Lung Disorder (PPHN) Linked to Paxil in Pregnancy

Studies have shown an increase in the risk of a lung disordered called Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn (PPHN) in babies whose mothers took Paxil during the second half of pregnancy. In utero, a baby does not need to use its lungs and therefore has a special fetal blood vessel, the ductus arteriosus, which carries blood from the pulmonary artery back to the heart, bypassing the lungs. In normal infants at birth, the ductus arteriosus closes as normal breathing begins, and oxygen-rich blood goes to the heart to be circulated throughout the body. However, in babies with Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn, the ductus arteriosus stays open. As a result, the blood bypasses the lungs, as before birth, and oxygen-poor blood circulates throughout the body to its organs. Signs of PPHN after birth include fast breathing and heart rate, blue skin, and problems breathing. PPHN is serious; infants may require mechanical breathing assistance. Some will die after birth and some will develop brain abnormalities and hearing problems.